the 2024 Range numbers are still estimates, won't know officially until an AWD is actually produced.I'm still trying to figure out how the Equinox EV has a 5% range loss going from FWD to AWD and the Lyriq has a 1 mile range loss. The only thing I can think of is the Lyriq AWD has one more ultium brick in the system.
I have the same question, daisy. At the moment, no one knows.Will it be possible to change between FWD and AWD with software switch in the AWD Equinox EV?
In the past, GM used an "AWD on demand" concept. Their old Versatrack AWD system was absolutely fabulous. Versatrack stayed FWD unless the front wheels lost traction. Then power would be routed almost instantly to any of the four wheels. The only real issue is you couldn't get a satisfying burnout from a standing start because Versatrack routed power that fast. You did get a good launch, even on sheets of ice.FWD gives more range than AWD. Will it be possible to change between FWD and AWD with software switch in the AWD Equinox EV?
My Rivian R1T does, and reported that Tesla's do. I have asked GM rep before and answer was, "don't know"
That is my best guess of what will occur. That’s been the case for pretty much all single vs dual motor EVs in this segmentSpeculation....maybe they will have a larger primary motor for FWD and a smaller, lighter, secondary motor for "on demand" eAWD in the rear. I just want that extra traction on steep gravel roads in moist conditions on an as needed basis. Primarily want the most efficient situation and that would be FWD for highway speeds, getting the most miles per kWh, and having a lightweight motor in the rear that won't affect efficiency so much due to weight.
I can't find it now but I saw a comparison of the various Ultium electric motors and the rear AWD motors are about 40% the size of the front motors.Speculation....maybe they will have a larger primary motor for FWD and a smaller, lighter, secondary motor for "on demand" eAWD in the rear. I just want that extra traction on steep gravel roads in moist conditions on an as needed basis. Primarily want the most efficient situation and that would be FWD for highway speeds, getting the most miles per kWh, and having a lightweight motor in the rear that won't affect efficiency so much due to weight.
Edit: Looks like I was just beat.I can't find it now but I saw a comparison of the various Ultium electric motors and the rear AWD motors are about 40% the size of the front motors.
That was later proven incorrect as the E-Ray doesn't use any of the Ultium motors. So it may be used for a future compact CUV.it will add traction when slip is detected. This particular setup is expected to feature on an all-wheel-drive Corvette, among other vehicles.
Based on the power ratings, it appears as if the AWD Lyric uses the same front motor as the hybrid Corvette (160hp). Given the low AWD penalty on the Lyric, I assume it is an induction motor like the 62kw motor. If I understand correctly the induction motors have the benefit of being able to draw little to no power and created little resistance when power is not needed. The drawback is that the motor cannot be used for regenerative braking. But I could be wrong.Edit: Looks like I was just beat.
View attachment 501
Edit 2:
That was later proven incorrect as the E-Ray doesn't use any of the Ultium motors. So it may be used for a future compact CUV.
I'm not sure the inability of a rear motor when it comes to regenerative braking is an issue. Remember, over two thirds of braking forces come from the front wheels even on an ICEV.Based on the power ratings, it appears as if the AWD Lyric uses the same front motor as the hybrid Corvette (160hp). Given the low AWD penalty on the Lyric, I assume it is an induction motor like the 62kw motor. If I understand correctly the induction motors have the benefit of being able to draw little to no power and created little resistance when power is not needed. The drawback is that the motor cannot be used for regenerative braking. But I could be wrong.
For the Rivian, it’s not just software. Rivian incorporated axle clutches in the rear drive units half-shafts that, when commanded by conserve mode, physically disconnects the drive units from the outboard portion of the shafts. This allows the rear wheels to free-wheel. The drive unit inverter can then turn “off” completely and the motor/reduction gears stop rotating. magnetic rotor/stator losses are eliminated, as well as all mechanical windage and reduction-gear/bearing friction losses. Hyundai/Kia also do that on the front drives of their e-GMP platform EVs, and Tesla incorporated axle clutches on their Semi’s rear driver axle set.My Rivian R1T has 4 motors, all same size and weight as far as I know, and all the changes in configuration from FWD to AWD are on the touchscreen...no buttons or knobs. Changing from all purpose mode (all motors engaged, typical for usual around town or highway driving) to Conserve Mode (FWD, 2 front motors active, best for long trips) changes range on full charge from 316 to 347. Pretty significant difference with absolutely no changes in weight. Still makes me wonder why a simple software change on the touchscreen might have a similar effect on the range of the AWD Equinox EV for better range on long trips.
These vehicles are simply large computers on wheels. Have had the Rivian R1T since last May 2022, and am receiving, on average, an over the air software update monthly. Numerous tweaks have been added that have improved comfort and functionality, and improved range. If I remember correctly, GM has said that over the air software updates would be possible with the Equinox EV, so there is always hope! All speculation, will find out in the months ahead.
+1 for the blue paint!For the Rivian, it’s not just software. Rivian incorporated axle clutches in the rear drive units half-shafts that, when commanded by conserve mode, physically disconnects the drive units from the outboard portion of the shafts. This allows the rear wheels to free-wheel. The drive unit inverter can then turn “off” completely and the motor/reduction gears stop rotating. magnetic rotor/stator losses are eliminated, as well as all mechanical windage and reduction-gear/bearing friction losses. Hyundai/Kia also do that on the front drives of their e-GMP platform EVs, and Tesla incorporated axle clutches on their Semi’s rear driver axle set.
For the Equinox rear assist drive unit with an induction rotor, it likely will turn off the inverter in FWD-only mode and save energy there. But axle clutches are $$ and outside the price/value box the Equinox is designed for. There will still be windage and friction losses as the rotor and gears idly spin, plus the rear unit’s always-present extra weight. An Equinox EV will likely replace both my 2013 Volt and my wife’s 2013 Subaru Outback, so a cost-effective AWD version w/ towing capacity (and blue paint) is a necessity.