It is amazing how a heavier vehicle is able to get 450 miles yet the lighter EQ gets less.
It does it with 2.4x the battery capacity. It only gets 1.5x the mileage, so the equinox is 1.6x more efficient.It is amazing how a heavier vehicle is able to get 450 miles yet the lighter EQ gets less.
...and the lousy aero of big blunt nosed trucks in general. Might as well mount a 4x8 foot sheet of plywood on the front.the lousy aerodynamics of towing
Thinking about this, having that big fat 4x8 on the front will also help reduce the range impact when towing. The Silverado is already so inefficient relative to other EVs that towing won't have the same impact as towing with a streamlined EV....and the lousy aero of big blunt nosed trucks in general. Might as well mount a 4x8 foot sheet of plywood on the front.
In my experience with both the Volt and Bolt GM's range claims has been on the conservative (low) side compared to what I have gotten.I'd like to see some tests done by unbiased parties before I'll believe that. I remember everything the F150 lightning promised and didn't deliver.
My 2011 Volt was EPA rated by GM at 35 miles range, but I was getting 45 to 48 miles for many, many years. Now, after 12 years of aging I'm down to the original 35 mile range. My Bolt EV with the new battery is seeing 300+ miles though GM's EPA rating is at 259 miles.Yup. Chevy's announcement is "The Bolt is a 200 mile EV starting at the low 30s." EPA says it'll go 238. First months after release, YouTubers are turning in 240, 250, 260 mile single-charge trips.
That's (another) low bar. Even people who bought the lightning for MSRP are feeling dumb, and that's without comparing to any other alternative.The Silverado EV is gonna make those people who paid well over MSRP for a Ford Lightning⚡ look pretty dumb.....
😎
Just my $0.02....